Part 3We discuss a number of ideas about, and approaches to personal process in this Part. We also make some suggestions for good working behaviors and professionalism in your artistic life. Table of Contents
The Process of AbstractionIn this section we suggest an approach to painting that may help you understand and develop a personal process and style, or aspects thereof, based on abstraction. Abstraction is the process of simplifying or selecting from the information available in a reference source. Its Latin root meaning is to draw away or draw from. Abstraction begins with choosing a reference source or image. This very act of choice results in a specific selection from an infinite range of possible choices of reference material. Consider the photographer. He points his camera in a specific direction. The number of possible directions is infinite. One would argue perhaps, that most would make no sense. But he chooses one. In the resulting single literal image, the visual information or detail selected is a tiny fraction of what was available for him to draw from. Thus, any literal image chosen as a reference is already an abstraction of sorts. The artist, working from such an image, is confronted with a problem. How much detail or information does he represent in his painting? On one hand, a photorealist will try and capture as much detail as he is technically capable of. From this extreme, there is a continuous spectrum of interpretations, each representing a personal choice of degree and kind of abstraction. Each such choice is a reduction of the information available in the reference image. On the other end of the spectrum, only the artist can recognize the presence of aspects of his reference source. In painting a tree, does the artist try and capture the form, shading and colour of every leaf? Will one or two brush strokes suffice to represent a leaf, a cluster of leaves, an entire branch, or possibly even the entire tree? He may not know the answer to this initially, but by examining how others have represented trees, by closely observing trees and experimenting until he is satisfied, he can discover exactly the right amount and kind of information that he must use to represent a tree. In summary, abstraction is the process of deciding exactly what aspect of a reference source an artist will represent in his image and in what manner it will be represented. Different Approaches to AbstractionThere are several ways one can approach the problem of learning their personal degree of abstraction for creating the images they desire. One way is by subtraction. The artist starts with all information and gradually removes elements of detail until he find the level of detail that is right for him. He might remove the detail of individual bricks in a wall by using larger masses of shape and colour, or non-representational textural marks to suggest individual bricks. He might decide to remove trees, people and other larger elements to allow the focus to shift to a select few. This degree and form of abstraction changes and evolves as the artist works through a series of images, each hopefully more satisfying than the previous. The artist is learning what information, what elements he needs to retain and what he can eliminate without detracting from and perhaps even improving the appeal of the work in progress. Another approach is by construction. The artist selects basic elements from a master reference source and builds on them. Using the curve of a beach and a mass of rocks from his master reference, he begins to add elements into the scene either from his master reference or other references. He moves trees, adds foreground brushes or flowers, adds people, removes buildings, and modifies colour and light until he gets a satisfying image. All its elements may have literal precursors although not in the master reference from which he began. Some elements may be totally imaginary. The resulting scene may evoke the response in a viewer “I’ve been there; I just can’t quite place it.” But, it has become an artificial or imaginary landscape. A third approach is to identify a particular element in a reference source or a particular characteristic and expand on it. The artist might be attracted to the sinuous lines and forms made by the crests of sand dunes in the desert. Ignoring the colours of sand and sky and the horizon to horizon panorama, he might isolate the shape formed by two intersecting dunes as his whole image and render it in shades of pink and green. The observer may not see any connection to a desert scene while it was in fact his primary inspiration and reference. Finally, the artist may use any combination of these approaches leading to synthetic images with one or more referential precursors. If we wish to use the chess metaphor of Part 1, the reference image becomes our teammate. In this case, the reference guides our choice, positioning and expressive form of the elements we add or modify, the brush marks we make. It also becomes the teammate of the opponent, our unconscious self. We not only have to consider our response to or assessment of what we have just painted but we must constantly check with the reference to assess the veracity of that we seek to achieve. The reference guides both our conscious implementation decisions and the gestalt evaluation of their result. Your Personal Vocabulary and Style GuideWhether you are conscious of the process or not, you are learning to paint abstractly. You are developing a personal visual vocabulary of content categories (e.g. seascapes), shapes (e.g. rocks and trees, rectangular building elements), colours (you may have a bias to blue or to warm light effects), textures, patterns, value relationships, design choices (e.g. strong diagonal lines) and other aspects that go into creating images. As you express these choices on a surface, the result is a personal style. Expect this style to be a living thing that evolves as you become more experienced and your tastes, interests and content preferences change. The Process of Non-objective PaintingWhereas abstraction works from external literal imagery, this process is primarily internally motivated. This, we believe, is a much more difficult process, but ultimately more rewarding. At least with abstraction, we have an external starting reference and can develop a process for adding to and subtracting from this reference to reach a goal. With the nonobjective approach, we depend entirely on the muse within for direction. Two Approaches to Non-objective PaintingThe first approach is a constructive one. We work from internal imagery and conceptual ideas. The images we create are rich in personal symbolism and meaning. We assemble, often in apparently random ways, the elements seen by our mind’s eye, our imagination. We may begin with a plan or with preparatory drawings or sketches. We can certainly include elements with an external reference, but their choice and disposition is guided purely by our internal creative sense. As in the case of abstraction, we will find that we have a personal vocabulary. Even without conscious choice we see we favour certain shapes, line, textures, colours, and compositional structures. We can develop an entire personal symbolism which we use to motivate our work. Kandinsky developed an elaborate theory of art and his painting was an expression of it. When we, the artist, are the viewer, we should have a good idea of what our work is expressing. In most cases, other viewers will have little of no clue to any meaning associated with its content. Be prepared to help them with descriptive titles or commentary. The second approach is that adopted by the abstract expressionist painters of the mid-twentieth century. In this case, we begin to make marks, colour choices and compositional arrangements without premeditation. Sometimes, the goal is to be totally void of conscious intent on the premise that deep psychological reservoirs in the unconscious can be tapped and brought to conscious expression. Non-objective painting is very much a case of playing the game as described in Part 1. It is a solitary game in which both players are oneself. Working in SeriesThere are several reasons for working in a series. Rarely can a good idea be fully captured or explored in a single work. Many different concepts, approaches, viewpoints, techniques and alternatives can be fruitfully and extensively explored before a subject is exhausted. Be aware that a series may go on for your lifetime. Art is an extremely complex system given the number of elements that go into a work. The elements of design in themselves provide a staggering array of choices. A common approach taken by scientists working with complex systems is to fix all the parameters but one. This one is changed through a series of experiments (consider an experiment as an individual work of art) searching for the value of it that gives the best result. This parameter is then fixed with the characteristic that gives the best result and another element is varied. This kind of disciple can work equally well for the artist. You learn nothing if you change everything at once. When you are working from a list of different design or style ideas, introduce change slowly, one point or element at a time. When one is integrated into your work, then introduce another. This is a process requiring time, dedication, patience and material. The rate of development of personal style will be proportional to the effort invested. Working TechniquesThe following is a collection of techniques that may help you as an artist, resolve issues associated with your work.
The solution is to develop all areas of a work in lockstep. A preparatory under-drawing is a good way to get an acceptable distribution of elements in the right proportions. Colour and value sketches certainly provide the artist with a good sense of how these pieces will fit together. When actually working with a specific colour, textural element, shape, continue its use throughout the entire image space as appropriate If we think of figure/ground relationships where the figure is the image element we are currently working on, develop aspects of the ground in step with the figure. Introduce appropriate colour areas, textural passages, shapes or lines to balance the current image element. This constant working back and forth between figure and ground, between dominating image elements and quiet spaces, will result in a more successful image with less work. Career and ProfessionalismAs we become more serious about our artistic life and begin to have wider contact with the world in reference to it, there are things we can do to either help or hinder the activity. In this section we provide some thoughts on the subject. Attitude and Behavior
Relations with Others
Working Habits
Marketing
|